The short answer
This annuity cold call script books a retirement income review without naming products or rates. The opener is honest about the call, discovery covers retirement timeline, income gaps and current holdings, and the objections section handles skeptics, busy people and do-not-solicit requests. It ends with a dated review appointment and a materials promise.
The script
Sample talk track. Fictional names. Adapt it to your offer and your rules.- Rep
Hi [name], this is [name] with [agency], a licensed insurance agency here in [state]. The reason for my call: we work with people around [area] on retirement income reviews, and I am calling a few neighbors this week. Did I catch you at a bad time?
- Prospect
What is this about exactly?
- Rep
Fair question. It is about one thing: whether your retirement income plan holds up against what rates are doing right now. No products on this call. If it makes sense, we book a 30 minute review at our office or by video. Before anything else, are you retired now, or is retirement on the horizon?
- Prospect
I retired last year.
- Rep
Congratulations, and that is exactly who these reviews help. Roughly how far out did you plan your income to carry you, or is most of it from a pension and Social Security?
- Prospect
Pension, Social Security, and a 401k I have not really touched.
- Rep
That untouched 401k is the piece most people our age have questions about, especially with rates where they are. I am not going to get into products or numbers on the phone, because that deserves a real conversation. What I would do is a 30 minute review: we look at what income you have locked, what is exposed, and whether anything is worth a second look. Tuesday morning or Thursday afternoon?
- Prospect
Is there any cost for that?
- Rep
None. It is how we meet people, and you leave with a clearer picture whether we ever work together or not. Tuesday at 10 or Thursday at 3?
- Prospect
Let's do Thursday.
- Rep
Thursday at 3 it is. I will text the address and a one page list of what to bring, statements are plenty, no need to prepare anything. If anything changes, that text reaches me. Thanks [name].
Why this script stays quiet about products
Annuity prospecting fails on the phone when reps try to sell on the call. The product is complex, the buyer is often retired, and regulators read these scripts closely: the FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule at 16 CFR 310.4 requires truthful identity and purpose disclosures, many states impose senior-specific suitability and replacement rules, and variable or registered products add securities obligations that a phone pitch can violate before the rep finishes the sentence. This script therefore books a retirement income review and names nothing else.
The trade-off is honest: fewer meetings booked per hundred contacts than an aggressive pitch would fake, and far fewer complaints, chargebacks and regulators per hundred clients.
The structure
Honest opener. Name, agency, licensed, what the call is about, and a bad-time check. Retired households answer the phone all day; they also hang up fast on anything that sounds like a pitch. Saying what the call is about, plainly, buys the next 60 seconds.
Status question. Retired now or on the horizon. This routes the whole conversation: a retiree talks income durability; a pre-retiree talks timeline and rollover decisions ahead.
Income mix question. Pension, Social Security, portfolio withdrawals. The rep listens for the piece the prospect has not examined, which is usually the untouched 401k or an old IRA.
The discipline line. No products or numbers on the phone, on purpose. Said out loud, this line does double duty: it lowers the prospect’s guard and it keeps the recording clean of recommendations the license and the facts cannot support.
The close. A 30 minute review at the office or by video, two dates, no cost stated plainly, and a materials promise by text: statements are plenty.
Objection handling
“Is this one of those annuity scams?”
Name it and slow down. “I know why you ask, and the honest answer is that bad actors use the same words I do. Here is how we are different in practice: no money moves on any first meeting, you bring statements, and you take everything home to think about. If anyone ever pressures you to move money same-day, that is your answer about them.” Prospects who hear a concrete test trust the meeting.
“I already have a financial advisor”
“Then you are ahead of most people, and I am not calling to replace him. Reviews like this are a second set of eyes; some advisors welcome them, and if yours has your income plan written down and stress-tested, you will confirm that in 30 minutes and be done.” If the prospect defends the advisor twice, close warmly and disposition Send materials or Not a fit. Never disparage the incumbent.
“We are not interested in annuities”
“I have not mentioned a single product, and I am not going to. The review is about whether your income plan holds up, and whatever answers that question is what we would talk about, even if the answer is leave everything where it is.” If the prospect repeats the refusal, honor it fully: remove, log, next.
“How did you get my number?”
“From a consumer list we licensed for the area; nobody gave me your name specifically.” Answering this honestly is both the law-adjacent move and the trust move. Misrepresenting affiliation or referral relationships is exactly what the FTC’s Impersonation Rule at 16 CFR 461.3 prohibits for businesses, and it kills the household’s trust instantly.
“Send me something in the mail first”
Agree and date it. “I will send a one page outline of what the review covers. If it reads useful, the card inside has my direct line, or I can call you Thursday to see what you thought. Fair?” Materials without a date never generate a meeting; materials with a dated follow-up generate half of them.
“I need to talk to my son first”
“That is the right instinct, and I would rather you two decide together. The outline I send covers everything I said so he can judge it. Should I plan on you both if we schedule, or would you like to talk with him first and have him call me?” Bring the family in rather than around; senior-specific rules in many states and plain ethics both point the same direction.
Gatekeeper line
Retired households have fewer gatekeepers, but adult children sometimes screen. Treat them as the decision partner they are: “This is [name] with [agency]. Is your mother the right person for a retirement income review conversation, or is that you?” A hostile gatekeeper becomes a do-not-call; a cooperative one becomes the reason the meeting happens.
Voicemail, 20 seconds
“Hi [name], [name] with [agency] in [town]. I called about a retirement income review, no cost, no obligation, about 30 minutes. Rates have moved enough this year that most households we see have at least one question worth answering. I will try you Thursday morning, or I am at [number].” No product names, no rates, no urgency claims. Log it so the next attempt changes daypart.
After the call
The AI summary should carry retirement status, income sources, the untouched-asset flag, the review slot and the materials promise. The rep edits any wrong field and sets the dated task before the next dial. Dispositions match the industry page: review appointment, rollover question, callback, send materials, not a fit, unreachable, left voicemail, do not call. The rollover question disposition matters especially: it flags leads whose review will involve moving employer-plan money, which brings suitability and disclosure duties with it.
Compliance in one paragraph
Consumer calls here are telemarketing: 16 CFR 310.4 requires truthful identity and purpose disclosure, limits calls to 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. local, and governs DNC and abandonment; National DNC screening applies unless an established business relationship exists, and TCPA consent rules for prerecorded and autodialed wireless calls sit at 47 CFR 64.1200, with the consent definition at 64.1200(f). Several states require all-party consent to record, so use a disclosure. State insurance licensing governs the seller, senior suitability and replacement rules vary by state, and securities obligations attach to variable products. DialBreeze applies your internal DNC list, quiet hours and attempt caps; suitability, licensing and consent are yours. This guide describes rules, not legal advice.
FAQ
Why does this script avoid naming products?
How do you respond to who gave you my number?
What is the goal of the discovery questions?
Are cold calls to consumers allowed in this business?
What should the rep never say on this call?
Sources
- ecfr.gov /current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-310/section-310.4
- ecfr.gov /current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-64/subpart-L/section-64.1200
- naic.org /
Operational guidance, not legal advice. Rules vary by state and by campaign.